TDD in Action

Open transmission-processor in javascript-projects/unit-testing/chapter-examples and follow along as we implement a project using TDD.

We need to write a Node module to process transmissions from the Voyager1 probe .

Example

Transmission

   "1410::<932829840830053761>"

Expected Result

   {
      id: 1410,
      rawData: 932829840830053761
   }

Requirements

The features for this project have already been broken down into small testable units. Let’s review them and then we will take it slow, one step at a time.

  1. Take in a transmission string and return an object.

  2. Return -1 if the transmission does NOT contain "::".

  3. Returned object should contain an id property.

    1. The value of id is the part of the transmission before the "::".
  4. The id property should be of type Number.

  5. Returned object should contain a rawData property.

    1. The value of rawData is the part of the transmission after the "::".
  6. Return -1 for the value rawData if the rawData part of the transmission does NOT start with < and end with >.

Requirement #1

Requirement: Take in a transmission string and return an object.

To get started on this we need to:

a. Create a blank test function. b. Give the test a name that is a clear, testable statement.

Creating a blank test is easy, go to processor.test.js and add an empty test method. Tests in Jest are declared with a test function. Remember that tests go inside of the describe function, which along with the string parameter describe the group of tests inside.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
   describe("transmission processor", function() {

      test("", function() {

      });

   });

Give the test the name "takes a string and returns an object".

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
   describe("transmission processor", function() {

      test("takes a string returns an object", function() {

      });

   });

Now that we identified a clear goal for the test, let’s add logic and expect calls in the test to verify the desired behavior. But wait… we haven’t added anything except an empty test at this point. There isn’t any actual code to verify. That’s okay, this is part of the TDD process.

We are going to think about and visualize how this feature should be implemented in code. Then we will write out in the test how this new code will be used.

We need to think of something that will satisfy the statement test("takes a string and returns an object". The test will be a function that is imported from a module. Below on line 1, a processor function is imported from the processor.js module.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
   const processor = require('../processor.js');

   describe("transmission processor", function() {

      test("takes a string and returns an object", () => {

      });

   });

We have an idea for a function named processor and we have imported it. Keep in mind this function only exists as a concept and we are writing a test to see if this concept makes sense.

Now for the real heart of the test. We are going to use expect().toBe() to verify that if we pass a string to processor, an object is returned. Carefully review lines 7 and 8 shown below.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
   const processor = require('../processor.js');

   describe("transmission processor", function() {

      test("takes a string and returns an object", function() {
         let result = processor("9701::<489584872710>");
         expect(typeof result).toBe("object");
      });

   });

On line 6 the processor function is called, with the value being stored in a result variable. On line 8 the result of the expression typeof result is compared to the value "object". Reminder that the typeof operator returns a string representation of a type. If typeof result evaluates to the string "object", then we know that processor returned an object.

Code Red

Let’s run the test!

Type in the command npm run test to check your test.

You should see an error about processor.js not existing. This makes sense, because we have not created the file yet. We are officially in the Red phase of Red, Green, Refactor!

   Error: Cannot find module '../processor.js'

Go Green!

Now that we have a failing test, we have only one choice. Make it pass.

  1. Add a processor.js file to your project.
  2. Inside of the module declare a processor function that takes a parameter and returns an object.

Contents of the new processor.js file.

1
2
3
4
5
   function processor(transmission) {
      return {};
   }

   module.exports = processor;

Run the test again.

Refactor if Needed

This solution is very simple and does not need to be improved. The refactor step does not always lead to an actual changing of your code. The most important part is to review your code to make sure that it’s efficient and meets your team’s standards.

Requirement #2

Requirement: Return -1 if the transmission does NOT contain "::".

Next we have a negative test requirement that tells us what should happen if the data is invalid. Before jumping into the code, let’s review the steps we took to implement requirement #1.

Review of TDD process:

  1. Create a blank test function.
  2. Give the test a name that is a clear, testable statement.
  3. Come up with test data that will trigger the described behavior.
  4. Think about what is needed, then write code that fulfills the stated behavior.
  5. Run the test and see the it fail.
  6. Implement the new code or feature used in the test.
  7. Run the test and see it pass.
  8. Review to see if refactor needed.

For requirement #2, the solution for steps 1 - 4 can be seen on lines 11 - 14 below.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
   const processor = require('../processor.js');

   describe("transmission processor", function() {

      test("takes a string and returns an object", function() {
         let result = processor("9701::<489584872710>");
         expect(typeof result).toBe("object");
      });

      test("returns -1 if '::' not found", function() {
         let result = processor("9701<489584872710>");
         expect(result).toBe(-1);
      });

   });

Now for step 5, run the test and see it fail. Notice that -1 was the expected value, but the actual value was and empty object, {}.

Next is step 6, write code that will make the test pass. Go to processor.js and update the processor function to check the transmission argument for the presence of '::'.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
   function processor(transmission) {
      if (transmission.indexOf("::") < 0) {
         // Data is invalid
         return -1;
      }
      return {};
   }

   module.exports = processor;

Lucky step 7 is to run the tests again. They should both pass.

Finally step 8 is to review the code to see if it needs to be refactored. As with the first requirement our code is quite simple and can not be improved at this time.

Requirement #3

Requirement: Returned object should contain an id property. The id is the part of the transmission before the "::".

The same steps will be followed, even though they are not explicitly listed.

See lines 16 - 19 to see the test added for this requirement. To test this case not.toBeUndefined() was used, which is checking if the two values are NOT equal. not.toBeUndefined() is used to make sure that result.id is NOT equal to undefined. Remember that if you reference a property on an object that does NOT exist, undefined is returned.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
   const processor = require('../processor.js');

   describe("transmission processor", function() {

      test("takes a string returns an object", function() {
         let result = processor("9701::<489584872710>");
         expect(typeof result).toBe("object");
      });

      test("returns -1 if '::' not found", function() {
         let result = processor("9701<489584872710>");
         expect(result).toBe(-1);
      });

      test("returns id in object", function() {
        let result = processor("9701::<489584872710>");
        expect(result.id).not.toBeUndefined();
      });

   });

The fail message looks a little different than what we have seen. The phrase “Expected ‘actual’ to be strictly unequal to” lets us know that the two values were equal when we didn’t expect them to be.

The object returned from processor doesn’t have an id property. We need to split the transmission on '::' and then add that value to the object with the key id. See solution in processor.js below.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
   function processor(transmission) {
      if (transmission.indexOf("::") < 0) {
         // Data is invalid
         return -1;
      }
      let parts = transmission.split("::");
      return {
         id: parts[0]
      };
   }

   module.exports = processor;

Run the tests again. That did it. The tests pass!

Line 6 splits transmission into the parts array, and line 8 assigns the first entry in the array to the key id.

Requirement #4

Requirement: The id property should be of type Number.

Again the same steps are followed, though not listed.

New test to be added to tests/processor.test.js:

1
2
3
4
   test("converts id to a number", function() {
      let result = processor("9701::<489584872710>");
      expect(result.id).toBe(9701);
   });

This test fails. Looks like we need to convert id to a number. Time to update the code in processor.js.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
function processor(transmission) {
   if (transmission.indexOf("::") < 0) {
      // Data is invalid
      return -1;
   }
   let parts = transmission.split("::");
   return {
      id: Number(parts[0])
   };
}

module.exports = processor;

Now for the great feeling of a passing tests!

Note

You may be wondering what happens if that data is bad and the id can’t be turned into a number. That is a negative test case related to this feature and is left for you to address in the final section.

Requirement #5

Requirement: Returned object should contain a rawData property. The rawData is the part of the transmission after the "::".

New test to be added to tests/processor.test.js:

1
2
3
4
   test("returns rawData in object", () => {
      let result = processor("9701::<487297403495720912>");
      expect(result.rawData).not.toBeUndefined();
   });

Let’s run the tests again to see where we are at.

We need to extract the rawData from the second half of the transmission string after it’s been split. Then return that in the object.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
   function processor(transmission) {
      if (transmission.indexOf("::") < 0) {
         // Data is invalid
         return -1;
      }
      let parts = transmission.split("::");
      let rawData = parts[1];
      return {
         id: Number(parts[0]),
         rawData: rawData
      };
   }

   module.exports = processor;

It’s that time again, our tests pass!

Requirement #6

Requirement: Return -1 for the value rawData if the rawData part of the transmission does NOT start with < and end with >.

Let’s think about what test data to use for this requirement. What ways could the transmission data be invalid?

  1. It could be missing < at the beginning
  2. It could be missing > at the end
  3. It could be missing both < and >
  4. Has < but the symbol is in the wrong place
  5. Has > but the symbol is in the wrong place

All these cases need to be covered by a test. Let’s start with #1, which is missing < at the beginning.

New test to be added to tests/processor.test.js:

1
2
3
4
   test("returns -1 for rawData if missing < at position 0", function() {
      let result = processor("9701::487297403495720912>");
      expect(result.rawData).toBe(-1);
   });

Run the tests and review the fail message.

Now add new code to processor.js to make the tests pass. Note that we don’t simply return -1, the requirement is to return the object and set the value of rawData to -1.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
   function processor(transmission) {
      if (transmission.indexOf("::") < 0) {
         // Data is invalid
         return -1;
      }
      let parts = transmission.split("::");
      let rawData = parts[1];
      if (rawData[0] !== "<") {
         rawData = -1;
      }
      return {
         id: Number(parts[0]),
         rawData: rawData
      };
   }

   module.exports = processor;

You know what’s next, our tests pass!

Example

The test data we used was missing < at the beginning. Add tests to cover these cases. -1 should be returned as the value for rawData for all of these.

  1. "9701::8729740349572>0912"
  2. "9701::4872<97403495720912"
  3. "9701::487297403495720912"
  4. "9701::<487297403495<720912>"

Use TDD to Add These Features

Use the steps demonstrated above to implement all or some of the features below. Take your time, you can do it!

  1. Trim leading and trailing whitespace from transmission.
  2. Return -1 if the id part of the transmission cannot be converted to a number.
  3. Return -1 if more than one "::" is found in transmission.
  4. Do not include the < > symbols in the value assigned to rawData.
  5. Return -1 for the value of rawData if anything besides numbers are present between the < > symbols.